Mums And Choice

CarolinaHound wrote:I bet you're just as cute as can be. All greasy and smelling like fries.

Excuse me while I....


There. Much better now.

Well arent u a sweety pie lol

xshivx wrote:Well arent u a sweety pie lol

I gotta put him in his place!

HotParadox wrote:I gotta put him in his place!

Na....na....nana...nanner

lol why???

xshivx wrote:lol why???

Because I aggravate her. Do it on purpose too.

xshivx wrote:lol why???

Because he's my good buddy, he has a great sense of humor and I love teasing him. It's an ongoing thing between us. Don't feel too bad for him, though; he usually gets me back!

CarolinaHound wrote:

xshivx wrote:lol why???

Because I aggravate her. Do it on purpose too.

That too.

Anyway, back to my mini rant -

I still maintain that if a couple decide they want to have children, then fine, but as with all things, finance it between you!

You kids are no benefit to me personally, and more than it would benefit you personally if part of your tax were used to feed and care for my dogs.

I would love to have six dogs and a larger house, if I could.

I cannot afford it, therefore, I make do with what I have.

Too many people have babies without thinking it through.

CarolinaHound wrote:

Old Timer wrote:

xshivx wrote:Nope
if i needed help for sumit else like psychological help and there was no other way, or had problems trusting people and needed help i would go for the help but nah i wudnt go on there for that

I sure do wish that we had some one as cute as you here working at our Mac Donalds.

Silver tongued devil. aka Suck up. hehehehe

Yeah well yer just jealous.

xshivx wrote:I've already gone through most of the points why i think we have those benifits

haha thanks OT but u wudnt wanna see me stressed on the job lol i aint so cute then i asure you
plus at the job it's all greasy and horrid lol aint a pretty site

When one sees a pretty face with a dazzling smile such as yours, one does not notice anything else. There is nothing dishonerable or wrong with the aquired mess of ones job, it could also be considered a badge of honor and shows that you are gainhfully employed as there are many that won't work.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw OT bless ya thank you
you just made my day

xshivx wrote:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw OT bless ya thank you
you just made my day

I agree completely with OT!

thanks ever so much HP
goodness everyone is so kind and generous here i love it already
i hope i can repay ur kindness someday

xshivx wrote:thanks ever so much HP
goodness everyone is so kind and generous here i love it already
i hope i can repay ur kindness someday

We love you right back, honey.
Did you get my PM to you yesterday?

I did thanks ever so much hun i tried to write bk but dont know if i did it write lol i can send u it in here if u like?

Any additional comments/thoughts on the premise of the OP?

*shrugs*

Also...

Parents should be more responsible for their kids, at least up until 16.

Heck, if you let yer dogs roam the streets, biting people, and being a public pest, they would soon be rounded up, and if you were the owner, you would stand the chance of having the animal PTS.

Now, I am not suggesting that we euthenise teen brats, up to no good, although in some cases it might not be a bad idea

But why should everyone have their peace or life bothered by the spawn of someone who doesn't even know what their own kid is up to?

Maybe we should be able to shoot such kids on sight?

u have a bit of an obsession with dogs dont u? lol

Just making the comparison.

People don't NEED to have kids.

They don't NEED to have dogs either.

But I would defend their right to have them, as long as neither are being a public nuisance, that is all I am saying.

xshivx wrote:I did thanks ever so much hun i tried to write bk but dont know if i did it write lol i can send u it in here if u like?

Well, I personally wouldn't post a private message in public or share a PM with anyone, because it is meant to be confidential, but if you think sharing this particular PM would help you, it is ok with me.

Do you not know how to use the PM feature? If you need help PMing, go to the link below, and I will walk you through it. That way we won't tie up this thread with the details of how to PM.

So xs, here is where to get help with any problem:
https://talkusdown.forumotion.com/general-chat-f2/problem-ask-me-for-help-t28.htm

It says MP on here, has anyone else noticed that rather pointless fact?

MP.

Not PM.

Pfffffffft.

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:Just making the comparison.

People don't NEED to have kids.

They don't NEED to have dogs either.

But I would defend their right to have them, as long as neither are being a public nuisance, that is all I am saying.

I disagree. People NEED to have kids. That's the purpose of life. Also, some people NEED to have dogs (or whatever pet suits them). Very common among the elderly, as they need the feeling of nurturing once their needed children have left the home. The nurturing nature of people doesn't stop once the children are grown and on their own. There are exceptions, of course, but humans in general have this primal instinct to procreate. Anything else in life falls a distant second.

xshivx wrote:aaaaaw thanks so much CH but nah i look terrible when im at work lol
and u can call em fries some of us over here do, but most of us call them chips
mmmmmmm chips lol

If I come to your wrk I hope I get service with a smile

im almost certain u would, i can't promise cus every1 has bad days but i think about 90% sure u would lol

xshivx wrote:im almost certain u would, i can't promise cus every1 has bad days but i think about 90% sure u would lol

good, so do you dress up as Ronald McDonald?

xshivx wrote:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw OT bless ya thank you
you just made my day

Anytime sweetie, have a really great day and take care of your self.

DM007 wrote:

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:Just making the comparison.

People don't NEED to have kids.

They don't NEED to have dogs either.

But I would defend their right to have them, as long as neither are being a public nuisance, that is all I am saying.

I disagree. People NEED to have kids. That's the purpose of life. Also, some people NEED to have dogs (or whatever pet suits them). Very common among the elderly, as they need the feeling of nurturing once their needed children have left the home. The nurturing nature of people doesn't stop once the children are grown and on their own. There are exceptions, of course, but humans in general have this primal instinct to procreate. Anything else in life falls a distant second.

I meant 'need' as in to do without it would cause death.

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:

DM007 wrote:

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:Just making the comparison.

People don't NEED to have kids.

They don't NEED to have dogs either.

But I would defend their right to have them, as long as neither are being a public nuisance, that is all I am saying.

I disagree. People NEED to have kids. That's the purpose of life. Also, some people NEED to have dogs (or whatever pet suits them). Very common among the elderly, as they need the feeling of nurturing once their needed children have left the home. The nurturing nature of people doesn't stop once the children are grown and on their own. There are exceptions, of course, but humans in general have this primal instinct to procreate. Anything else in life falls a distant second.

I meant 'need' as in to do without it would cause death.

Actually, it would. If not for this "NEED", we would not have evolved/developed into what we are, or would not continue if it ceased. The need is primal. It is the most basic instinct to the animal kingdom, of which man is a member. Civilization and other activities are only a by-product of this instinct.

We are not in danger of dying off as a species, if that is what you mean. If we were, there might be some justification for paying people to have kids, as we effectively are. Last I looked we were over populated.

Just a thought...

No i dont Qi123 lol i dress up as a lobby hostess cus tht's what i do

and thanks OT sweety u take care of urself too

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:We are not in danger of dying off as a species, if that is what you mean. If we were, there might be some justification for paying people to have kids, as we effectively are. Last I looked we were over populated.

Just a thought...

That was my point. We have our "civilized rules of law" dictating what is already provided by nature. Our "overpopulation" is a byproduct. If left to ONLY nature, it may not be so. Our competitive nature is also a part of it. If we encourage/ensure the need/right to procreate, and suppress our basic competitive nature, it becomes unbalanced. Nature, except for humans, remains balanced, until humans interfere. We prevent the natural course of balance.

CarolinaHound wrote:I don't know how long it is here, but there is maternity leave. I don't think it goes to a year. Maybe three months, then there has to be a medical reason for any longer. I think it more depends on the company as to how long they allow. But there is a law to protect a woman from just being let go when she has a baby.

I think its three months here in the US. I can't remember its been eight years since my youngest was born. Don't forget the family leave act where the husband can take time off too. I never took advantage of that I lost enough sleep through all those night feedings.
I have two children one 14 and the other 8 so I always tell people I havent' slept in 22 years

In my opinion a woman should be garanteed her job for at least the three month time period she is out on leave. Having a child is a personal choice but it shouldn't be held against the woman for making that choice either.

Well if women stop having kids, then we stop, period.

DM007 wrote:

The Ghost Of Yeah Well Fi wrote:We are not in danger of dying off as a species, if that is what you mean. If we were, there might be some justification for paying people to have kids, as we effectively are. Last I looked we were over populated.

Just a thought...

That was my point. We have our "civilized rules of law" dictating what is already provided by nature. Our "overpopulation" is a byproduct. If left to ONLY nature, it may not be so. Our competitive nature is also a part of it. If we encourage/ensure the need/right to procreate, and suppress our basic competitive nature, it becomes unbalanced. Nature, except for humans, remains balanced, until humans interfere. We prevent the natural course of balance.

Two reasons I had a vasectomy eight years ago.
1. I want to sleep again.
2. Two kids is enough for any family (my opinion).
3. 6 billion people already inhabit the earth and the negative effect it has on the earth is more apparent everyday.

ok three reasons.

Old Timer wrote:Well if women stop having kids, then we stop, period.

Lol.

I am not suggesting that ALL women, ALL over the world, cease to have children.

But isn't one or two enough?

Why have more when you cannot financially cope with those that you do have, then expect others to bale you out?

That was my issue.

The only way that it will ever be controled is by making it mandatory for a certain amount of people to become sterile or in othr words --snip snip. And the only way that they could ever get away with doing that would to be doing it at birth.

1 or 2 kids is enough

and i agree u shudnt have more kids than that if u can't cope with it or support them

Lol.

Case closed then.

I shall return later, with a new moan ..... about poor customer service

x

xshivx wrote:1 or 2 kids is enough

and i agree u shudnt have more kids than that if u can't cope with it or support them

That is a really good attitude. How are you today kiddo.