MA State Senate Passes Law:Mandatory Vaccinations of All Citizens

A new law passed by the state Senate in Massachusetts calls for mandatory vaccinations of all citizens and a $1,000 / day fine for those who refuse to cooperate. It also legalizes health care "interrogations" of Mass. citizens, forced entry into homes without a warrant, the on-site destruction of buildings or objects suspected of harboring the virus, the government kidnapping of family pets, "involuntary transportation" of people into quarantine camps, being held at gunpoint and much more.

Here is what was passed in the MA State Senate:

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st02pdf/st02028.pdf



Informative article:

Wake Up, America: Forced vaccinations, quarantine camps, health care interrogations and mandatory "decontaminations"

by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

http://www.naturalnews.com/026934_health_public_health_quarantine.html

The United States of America is devolving into medical fascism and Massachusetts is leading the way with the passage of a new bill, the "Pandemic Response Bill " 2028, reportedly just passed by the MA state Senate and now awaiting approval in the House. This bill suspends virtually all Constitutional rights of Massachusetts citizens and forces anyone "suspected" of being infected to submit to interrogations, "decontaminations" and vaccines.

It's also sets fines up to $1,000 per day for anyone who refuses to submit to quarantines, vaccinations, decontamination efforts or to follow any other verbal order by virtually any state-licensed law enforcement or medical personnel. You can read the text yourself here: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/sen...

Here's some of the language contained in the bill:

(Violation of 4th Amendment: Illegal search and seizure)

During either type of declared emergency, a local public health authority... may exercise authority... to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into and investigation of the premises; to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to decontaminate or cause to be
decontaminated any building or facility; to destroy any material; to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons;

(Violation of 14th Amendment; illegal arrest without a warrant)

...an officer authorized to serve criminal process may arrest without a warrant any person whom the officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection and shall use reasonable diligence to enforce such order. (Gunpoint)

(Government price controls)

The attorney general, in consultation with the office of consumer affairs and business regulation, and upon the declaration by the governor that a supply emergency exists, shall take appropriate action to ensure that no person shall sell a product or service that is at a price that unreasonably exceeds the price charged before the emergency.

"Involuntary Transportation" (also known as kidnapping)

Law enforcement authorities, upon order of the commissioner or his agent or at the request of a local public health authority pursuant to such order, shall assist emergency medical technicians or other appropriate medical personnel in the involuntary transportation of such person to the tuberculosis treatment center.

$1,000 / day in fines

Any person who knowingly violates an order, as to which noncompliance
poses a serious danger to public health as determined by the commissioner or the local public health authority, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 30 days or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars per day that the violation continues, or both.

Forced vaccinations

Furthermore, when the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction determines that either or both of the following measures are necessary to prevent a serious danger to the public health the commissioner or local public health authority may exercise the following authority: (1) to vaccinate or provide precautionary prophylaxis to individuals as protection against communicable disease...

Forced quarantine for those who refuse (illegal imprisonment without charge)

An individual who is unable or unwilling to submit to vaccination or treatment shall not be required to submit to such procedures but may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health, as determined by the commissioner, or a local public health authority operating within its jurisdiction.

Arrest for refusal to be "decontaminated"

If an individual is unable or unwilling to submit to decontamination or procedures necessary for diagnosis, the decontamination or diagnosis procedures may proceed only pursuant to an order of the superior court... During the time necessary to obtain such court order, such individual may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal to submit to decontamination or diagnosis procedures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.

Interrogation

When the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction reasonably believes that a person may have been exposed to a disease or condition that poses a threat to the public health, in addition to their authority under section 96 of chapter 111, the commissioner or the local public health authority may detain the person for as long as may be reasonably necessary for the commissioner or the local public health authority, to convey information to the person regarding the disease or condition and to obtain contact information... If a person detained under subsection (1) refuses to provide the information requested, the person may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health...

Forced isolation and quarantine

An order for isolation or quarantine may include any individual who is unwilling or unable to undergo vaccination, precautionary prophylaxis, medical treatment, decontamination, medical examinations, tests, or specimen collection and whose refusal of one or more of these measures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.

Forced entry into any home or building...

There's a lot more in this bill, including language that allows Mass. police to enter any home or building without a search warrant, to destroy any object or building they suspect may pose a threat to public safety, to order the closing and / or decontamination of any facility using highly toxic chemical decontamination agents, and to arrest, detain and interrogate anyone who gets in their way.

Meanwhile, all state law enforcement and medical personnel are granted complete immunity from prosecution for their part in violating your Constitutional rights. So if they violate your right to due process, or they accidentally destroy your home, or they kill your family dog because they suspect it might be infected, you have absolutely zero recourse.

Under this bill, Massachusetts becomes a medical police state. There is no debating it. It's all written, clear as day, in this law: The citizens of Massachusetts will have no rights, period. The Constitution is ancient history. You are now the property of the State.

Kiss your freedoms goodbye

Massachusetts, it seems, has never met a vaccine it didn't like. This is the same state that rounded up the parents of schoolchildren who hadn't been vaccinated, then corralled them into a courtroom (with attack dogs standing guard outside) and forced vaccine injections onto all the schoolchildren under the threat of jail time for parents who resisted.

Remember, readers, that this is all taking place in the "land of the free," a nation that former President George Bush claimed was so envied around the world that terrorists attacked America because they "hate freedom" and wanted to destroy our way of life. But terrorists need no help attacking freedom as long as Massachusetts is in the vaccine game, because this latest form of "gunpoint medicine" destroys freedom for everyday Americans in a way that terrorists could have never hoped to accomplish with all the bombs in the world.

Massachusetts , it seems, has done what terrorists could not: It has turned "free" Americans into medical slave subjects who no longer have any freedom to decide the details of their own medical care. All options have been stripped from them but one: The Big Pharma option. That's the one that involves using untested, unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines that could paralyze you or even kill you. All to defend you against a virus that's so weak, almost anyone with decent levels of vitamin D and basic nutrition can resist the virus without incident.

But Massachusetts , as you'll see below, is just the beginning. It turns out that the whole nation could soon find itself under a similar forced vaccination policy...

Isolation camps, forced vaccinations and more

In 2006, former President George Bush signed into law the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP). It gives power to the Secretary of the U.S. government's Health and Human Services department (HHS) to declare any infectious disease a "national emergency" and therefore require mandatory vaccination of the entire population. Because of the existence of this PREP Act, the entire population of the USA is now but one pen stroke away from being subjected to mandatory swine flu vaccinations at gunpoint.

Those who resist such vaccines will be arrested and taken away for "isolation" in domestic prison camps. They can't just leave vaccine refusers free to live among the population, of course, because that would send the message that anyone can refuse the vaccines without consequence. So they'll arrest those who refuse the vaccine, labeling them "a threat to national security" (enemies of the state) and imprison them without trial, without charges and without any legal representation whatsoever.

Meanwhile, all those who take part in enforcing these crimes against the American people will be granted complete immunity. From the HHS website: "[the Secretary may] issue a declaration... that provides immunity from tort liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of (vaccine or other pharmaceutical) countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency..."

There are other laws already on the books that strip Americans of virtually all Constitutional rights in a "pandemic emergency" scenario. One such act is The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (S. 3678), which probably merits another article altogether.

Have no illusions: At the stroke of a pen, the Constitutional rights of all Americans will be immediately suspended. Mandatory vaccinations and "decontaminations" will kick in and the mass arrest of resisters will begin. There will be no court, no trial, no jury and no due process. Your actions will be dictated to you by a law enforcement officer or a health care worker who has been granted complete immunity, so if you just happen to get kicked around a bit (or shot), there's really nothing you can do about it.

Some might argue these are necessary actions to save a nation from a deadly pandemic. And yet they forget that the pandemic has been intentionally allowed to worsen by censoring information about vitamin D and natural remedies that could stop it. Somebody at the top, in other words, wants this pandemic to get really bad, perhaps because it allows them to invoke precisely the draconian response I've outlined in this article. Seizing power in a Democracy cannot be accomplished by simply declaring war on the rights of the People. Rather, a situation must be engineered where the People are so desperate that they beg to be controlled. Releasing a pandemic into the wild is the perfect way to accomplish precisely that.

Timing

None of these laws will be invoked before the vaccines are ready in large numbers, of course. Part of the purpose in all this is to prop up Big Pharma profits with massive vaccination efforts, so until the vaccines are actually available, don 't expect to see any declarations of a public emergency.

It might take until October or November before the vaccines are readily available in sufficient quantity to inject just half the U.S. population. But once that milestone is reached, a declaration of a pandemic emergency is imminent. Trust me on this point: They won't let all those hundreds of millions of vaccines sit around unused; they'll make sure they get injected into the People as soon as possible, because that's the only way to justify making more.

So the sequence of events we're likely to see here are:

#1) Waiting on vaccine manufacturing to procure at least 150 million doses in the U.S. Probable timeframe = October.

#2) Hyping up a few local swine flu breakouts in schools in order to justify step #3. Probable time frame = November / December.

#3) Declaring a full-blown national emergency and announcing mandatory vaccinations for everyone (to use up the vaccines that are now available). Probable time frame = January / February / March.

#4) If the disease continues to spread, this is when you'll see forced entry into homes and buildings, forced "decontamination" sprayings, widespread arrests and forced quarantine of resisters, Martial Law and a complete crackdown on freedoms (especially in the inner cities). This will likely continue through the winter until Spring arrives, bringing the sunshine that will suppress the virus around the May 2010 time frame.

All this is written in black ink. It's already part of the pandemic response plan. Body bags, FEMA camps and much more.

Two years ago, this was all the domain of conspiracy theory "wingnuts." Now it's State law. Now it's being openly discussed in security conferences and health care meetings. What will we do when the hospital beds are full? How will we accomplish the "involuntary transportation" of those who are infected? Are there enough zip-tie handcuffs to go around? How do we disarm and arrest citizens who refuse to be vaccinated? How do we prevent National Guard troops from becoming infected themselves?

These are the questions circulating now at high levels, all across the world. And the answers are always the same: Aban don freedoms. Strip the People of any rights. Dictate from the top down and arrest anyone who gets in your way.

Welcome to the Land of the Free. I hope you are prepared for what looks to be coming, because this isn't America anymore, folks. This is Amerika, and the Constitutional rights you thought you had are about to be written right off the books.

Isn't it interesting that what the so called "wingnuts" have been saying is starting to come to pass.

Here is the thing though. If everyone refuses, and they should if there is an ounce of American spirit within them.

Then this law has no teeth.

Imagine how bad it will look when families are rounded up and arrested, and jailed on national TV for not wanting to do this.

The American people will not stand for this and outrage will follow.

We the good people of America will win.

The evil vile fu*ks will lose.

I didn't read the whole article, but mandatory vaccinations are not new.

Basically, you either need to vaccinate everyone or no one. People will choose not to vaccinate their children to avoid the risk of complication, however, they still get the benefits of their child not catching the disease because all of the other parents vaccinated their own children. It's a case of herd immunity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity

However, if enough people decide not to vaccinate their children then it puts the whole community at risk. You might do the right thing and vaccinate your own child, but your child still dies because the person next door decided to use homeopathy or voodism to protect their child against rubella.

Mandatory vaccinations were key to eliminating smallpox.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox

I basicly gives them the right to impose marshal law without calling it marshal law. And all they have to do is start whispers of the next "pandimic". The word will be spread and the fear started and they have every right to bust down your doors and search everything you have. And people thought Bush's phone taps were bulls%%t. This is the samething, just a different tactic. Worse.

Kazza wrote:I didn't read the whole article, but mandatory vaccinations are not new.

Basically, you either need to vaccinate everyone or no one. People will choose not to vaccinate their children to avoid the risk of complication, however, they still get the benefits of their child not catching the disease because all of the other parents vaccinated their own children. It's a case of herd immunity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity

However, if enough people decide not to vaccinate their children then it puts the whole community at risk. You might do the right thing and vaccinate your own child, but your child still dies because the person next door decided to use homeopathy or voodism to protect their child against rubella.

Mandatory vaccinations were key to eliminating smallpox.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox

No one should be forced to take a vaccination. If there is a question of the safety of a vaccine and people feel uneasy about it. It should not be forced.

It has to be proven to work, and be safe.

If people feel it is safe they will take the vaccine.

No one should be forced ever.

Theophilus wrote:

Kazza wrote:I didn't read the whole article, but mandatory vaccinations are not new.

Basically, you either need to vaccinate everyone or no one. People will choose not to vaccinate their children to avoid the risk of complication, however, they still get the benefits of their child not catching the disease because all of the other parents vaccinated their own children. It's a case of herd immunity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity

However, if enough people decide not to vaccinate their children then it puts the whole community at risk. You might do the right thing and vaccinate your own child, but your child still dies because the person next door decided to use homeopathy or voodism to protect their child against rubella.

Mandatory vaccinations were key to eliminating smallpox.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox

No one should be forced to take a vaccination. If there is a question of the safety of a vaccine and people feel uneasy about it. It should not be forced.

It has to be proven to work, and be safe.

If people feel it is safe they will take the vaccine.

No one should be forced ever.

It's always been a contentious issue, but either way it's not a new one. Mandatory vaccinations have been around for decades.


Personally I'm a little undecided. The health benefits of vaccination programs are overwhelming compared to the risks, but only if everyone gets them. Normally I'd be against the government forcing people to do anything, however this is more complicated. If someone decides not to get vaccinated then they're putting everyone else at risk.

kazza, read the whole thing. This is outrageous. This is mandatory to the point of ...
"$1,000 / day fine for those who refuse to cooperate. It also legalizes health care "interrogations" of Mass. citizens, forced entry into homes without a warrant, the on-site destruction of buildings or objects suspected of harboring the virus, the government kidnapping of family pets, "involuntary transportation" of people into quarantine camps, being held at gunpoint and much more..."

This is unconstitutional and is in total violation of EVERY AMERICAN'S Constitutional rights.

HotParadox wrote:kazza, read the whole thing. This is outrageous. This is mandatory to the point of ...
"$1,000 / day fine for those who refuse to cooperate. It also legalizes health care "interrogations" of Mass. citizens, forced entry into homes without a warrant, the on-site destruction of buildings or objects suspected of harboring the virus, the government kidnapping of family pets, "involuntary transportation" of people into quarantine camps, being held at gunpoint and much more..."

This is unconstitutional and is in total violation of EVERY AMERICAN'S Constitutional rights.

It would be one thing if there was a case of "the pox" or something in a nieghborhood and they locked down that area, evaluated it and took action. The law already gives them that right and it's understandable in that situation. But what you posted HP makes it way to easy for government to take over a sectoin of the town and take that property away from someone they decide may have a virus. Not saying that's why they passed that law, but if I can come up with the idea of using the law to take away someones land for later development, a crooked politition can definatly think of it. It just makes it way to easy to destroy somebody's life with the hint of a virus.

This has the potential to effect more that just a 'little neighborhood', CH. this potentially will effect all US citizens.

I wonder how much of this they would have done anyway.

They declared a state of martial law in New Orleans didn't they? Does that allow them to do all of the above as well? I can understand why the legislation would be necessary in the case of a real pandemic, so I guess what I'm wondering is how much they are already able to do under existing legislation.

I know. That is rediculous. And as soon as one state gets away with it, the others will soon follow, and soon the federal government will take charge. U.S. citizins are losing more and more control of our lives and if people don't soon wake up and stop it, we'll all be living in one giant prison.

Kazza wrote:I wonder how much of this they would have done anyway.

They declared a state of martial law in New Orleans didn't they? Does that allow them to do all of the above as well? I can understand why the legislation would be necessary in the case of a real pandemic, so I guess what I'm wondering is how much they are already able to do under existing legislation.

Right now there has to be a disaster, with the above there only has to be a threat of it. Like with the swine flu, which has so far just been a flu bug that has been blown out of proportion by the media. As it stands, the government can't do any of that until it really becomes a problem. With that law all they need is someone to run a fever and they can start implimenting it.

The government has always forced vaccinations. Doesn't anyone have kids? They can't enroll in school until they are vaccinated.

Anybody ever been in the military? One of the first things you get in boot camp is a cocktail of vaccinations.

I have to go back and read the rest of the article but the vaccination part is nothing new.

true slick but never before did they have the power to fine you $1000.00 a day for every day you resist, take your pets or hold you at GUNPOINT.

HotParadox wrote:true slick but never before did they have the power to fine you $1000.00 a day for every day you resist, take your pets or hold you at GUNPOINT.

Actually, they do. Failure to enroll your children in school is, in some state definitions, neglect, abuse, and/or failure to provide for the basic welfare of a child. Any of which can be a crime. Any crime is subject to all of the above government intervention. Just because a cop doesn't point a gun at you, or the court doesn't fine you, doesn't mean they can't. Even a simple traffic violation is subject to the same. Get stopped for speeding, then try to leave before you are allowed, and continue to resist. At some point, your liberty will be denied, and they will probably point guns at you.

Hi everyone. Has anyone heard anything about what England was going to try. I think that they were going to try and make it mandatory for everyone to take a pill that is part asprin and blood pressure and cholestrol medicine. If I remember it right they may try it here. All I can think of is how many folks will it kill because they are allergic to that stuff.

DM007 wrote:

HotParadox wrote:true slick but never before did they have the power to fine you $1000.00 a day for every day you resist, take your pets or hold you at GUNPOINT.

Actually, they do. Failure to enroll your children in school is, in some state definitions, neglect, abuse, and/or failure to provide for the basic welfare of a child. Any of which can be a crime. Any crime is subject to all of the above government intervention. Just because a cop doesn't point a gun at you, or the court doesn't fine you, doesn't mean they can't. Even a simple traffic violation is subject to the same. Get stopped for speeding, then try to leave before you are allowed, and continue to resist. At some point, your liberty will be denied, and they will probably point guns at you.

you're correct. but to do this to me or my loved ones because we refuse to allow them to violate our bodies, is unconstitutional.
Vitamin D-3 is now proven to be most effective against this and other flus but the big pharmas won't get rich by pushing vit d-3 and the government is aligned with the big pharmas so the obvious solution to the pandemic is shoot them up with the vaccine and if they refuse, shoot them period. BS

Old Timer wrote:Hi everyone. Has anyone heard anything about what England was going to try. I think that they were going to try and make it mandatory for everyone to take a pill that is part asprin and blood pressure and cholestrol medicine. If I remember it right they may try it here. All I can think of is how many folks will it kill because they are allergic to that stuff.

No one in my circle has heard of this, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least.